Wheelock v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER adopting 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 20 Unopposed MOTION to remand filed by Commissioner of Social Security; the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and remanded for further proceedings; directing the Clerk to enter judgment. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 7/25/2012. (BRS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
STEPHANIE A. WHEELOCK,
Plaintiff,
-vs-
Case No. 6:11-cv-1862-Orl-28GJK
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
______________________________________
ORDER
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Judgment with
Remand (Doc. No. 20) filed July 20, 2012. The United States Magistrate Judge has
submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and consideration
of the Joint Notice of Non-Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22), the
Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and
Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
That the Report and Recommendation filed July 23, 2012 (Doc. No. 21) is
ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand is GRANTED.
3.
The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and
remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (sentence
four) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
4.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to thereafter
close this file.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida this 25th day of July, 2012.
Copies furnished to:
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?