Coach, Inc. et al v. Visitors Flea Market, LLC et al

Filing 118

ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 117 Report and Recommendations. The Court will adopt in part the case management schedule proposed in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 117), and will enter a separate Am ended Case Management and Scheduling Order. Further, Defendants' request to limit Plaintiffs' discovery in the Plaza Action to issues not previously addressed during discovery in this action is denied for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 117). Signed by Senior Judge Patricia C. Fawsett on 12/29/2012. (MTH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
COACH, INC., COACH SERVICES, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.

CASE NO. 6:11-CV-1905-ORL-19TBS

VISITORS FLEA MARKET, LLC, DELROY
JOSEPHS, JULIO BATISTA, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
This case was considered by the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 117, filed December 11, 2012). No objection to
said Report and Recommendation was filed. Upon consideration, it is
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 117) is ADOPTED and
AFFIRMED IN PART. The United States Magistrate Judge has noted in his Report
Recommendation that discovery has closed, the deadline for dispositive motions has passed,
the parties have filed their Joint Pretrial Statement, and no party has alleged that it is not
ready to try this action. Accordingly, Defendants, Visitors Flea Market, LLC, Visitors Plaza,
Inc. and Delroy Josephs' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Proposed Scheduling Order Pursuant to the
Court's November 16, 2012 [DE 105] Order (Doc. No. 109, filed November 27, 2012) is
SUSTAINED. The Court will adopt IN PART the case management schedule proposed in
the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 117), and will enter a separate
Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order.
Further, Defendants' request to limit Plaintiffs' discovery in the Plaza Action to issues
not previously addressed during discovery in this action is DENIED for the reasons stated

in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 117).
DONE AND ORDERED at Orlando, Florida, this
2012.

Copies to:
Counsel of Record

29th

day of December,