Rich v. City of Orlando, Mayor et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Howard Rich. The motion is denied without prejudice and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complain t and an renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis by 1/17/2012. Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in the case being dismissed and closed without further notice. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 1/3/2012. Copies mailed.(LAM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION HOWARD RICH, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 6:11-cv-1936-Orl-31DAB CITY OF ORLANDO, MAYOR; ORLANDO POLICE DEPT., CHIEF OF POLICE; REP. W. ANDERSON; and REP. B. ALMEIDA, Defendants. ______________________________________ ORDER This cause comes before the Court on the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 2) filed December 2, 2011. On December 14, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 5) recommending that the complaint be dismissed and that the application be denied. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED as part of this 2. The complaint in this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an Order. amended complaint by January 17, 2012, which complies with the dictates of the Report and Recommendation. Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in the case being dismissed and closed without further notice. 3. The Application to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a renewed motion with the Amended Complaint. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on this 3rd day of January, 2012. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?