Rolyn Companies, Inc. v. Southern Plate Glass, Inc. et al

Filing 123

ORDER striking unauthorized reply (Doc.89), and denying as moot 91 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 6/16/2014. (Smith, Thomas)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
ROLYN COMPANIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 6:13-cv-358-Orl-28TBS

SOUTHERN PLATE GLASS, INC., H & B
GLASS CONTRACTING, INC., OLDCASTLE
BUILDING ENVELOPE, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________________________
ORDER
Defendant Southern Plate Glass, Inc., filed a motion to compel better answers
to interrogatories from Plaintiff Rolyn companies, Inc. on May 22, 2014. (Doc. 85).
Plaintiff filed its notice of compliance/response to the motion on June 5, 2014. (Doc.
86).
On June 9, 2014, Defendant Southern Plate Glass filed a response
(“Response”) to Plaintiff’s notice of compliance/response (Doc. 89), and Plaintiff filed
its motion to strike the Response (“Motion”) (Doc. 91).
Middle District of Florida Local Rule 3.01(a) and (b) provide for the filing of
motions and responses. The Rule states that “[n]o party shall file any reply or further
memorandum directed to the motion or response allowed in (a) and (b) unless the
Court grants leave.” M.D. Fla. Rule 3.01c).
The Court construes the Response (Doc. 89) as an unauthorized reply which is
STRICKEN. The Response having been stricken, the Motion (Doc. 91) is DENIED as

moot.
DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida, on June 16, 2014.

Copies to all Counsel

-2-