Hamptons at Metrowest Condominium Association, Inc. v. Park Avenue at Metrowest, Ltd. et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying 3 Motion to Seal, directing Clerk to file normally. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 6/3/2013. (ED)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION HAMPTONS AT METROWEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Garnishor, v. Case No: 6:13-cv-608-Orl-31DAB FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Garnishee, in relation to PARK AVENUE AT METROWEST, LTD. and EPOCH MANAGEMENT, INC., State Court Defendants. ORDER Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) sought to file a settlement agreement between, on the one hand, Hamptons at Metrowest Condominium Association, Inc. (the “Association”) and, on the other, Park Avenue at Metrowest, Ltd. and Epoch Management, Inc. Federal contended the document established the amount in controversy in this matter. Because of a confidentiality agreement, Federal sought to file the document under seal and filed a motion (Doc. 3) seeking leave to do so. On May 1, the Court ordered Federal to submit the agreement for in camera review, which Federal accomplished on or about May 2, 2013. The Court also ordered the Association to show cause in writing by May 13, 2013 why the agreement should not be unsealed. The Association has not done so. Having reviewed the agreement, the Court finds nothing within it that would justify filing under seal, thereby denying the public the ability to inspect the document. See, e.g., In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 355 (11th Cir. 1987) (“There is no question that the press and the public jointly possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records and public documents.”). Accordingly, the Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Doc. 3) is DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to docket the settlement agreement normally. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on June 3, 2013. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?