Barson v. Sharr

Filing 44

ORDER adopting 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 40 Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default Final Judgment. The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court enters JUDGMENT on Count I of Plaintiff's complaint in favor of Plaintiff Zachary Barson and against Defendant Ryan W. Starr for damages in the amount of $90,000; costs in the amount of $607.30; and attorney's fees in the amount of $6,829.87. Count II of the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 11/24/2014. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ZACHARY BARSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:13-cv-1767-Orl-40TBS RYAN W. SHARR, Defendant. ORDER This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Default Final Judgment (Doc. 40) filed on October 14, 2014. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the Motion be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed November 4, 2014 (Doc. 43), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Amended Motion to Default Final Judgment (Doc. 40) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 3. The Court enters JUDGMENT on Count I of Plaintiff’s complaint in favor of Plaintiff Zachary Barson and against Defendant Ryan W. Starr for damages in the amount of $90,000; costs in the amount of $607.30; and attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,829.87. 4. Count II of the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on November 24, 2014. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?