Monserrate et al v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Filing 261

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 257 Motion for Settlement; adopting 259 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 10/3/2016. (VMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION DEBRA MONSERRATE; KELLY BIRCHELL; SHAWN CRAFT; VIVIAN EDWARDS; BILL FABER; SUSAN O’HEARN; FARRELL PRUDENT; PAMELA WARD; LAURA M. SMITH; AMY FERNANDEZ; ARNELLA MOORE; ANTOINETTE ELKINS; KAREN ANNUNZIATA; STEPHANIE FRANCIS; BEVERLY GILCHRIST; NICOLE ELLINGTON; MAYRA FELIX; TARYN HICKS; GREG MAYBACH; ELLISON ARIAS; ROBIN HODGEKINSON-PRICE; LYDIA MARRON; SARA YASTE; DALE EASTERWOOD; GALO PATRICK FLORES; ALEXANDRA VARDY; WILMA SANTA; ERIN NORMAN; SUSIE ANDERSON; MIKAELA DELPHA; VALARIE STROUD; SARA BULLARD; MICHAEL MILTON; JAVIER PASTRANA; BRENDA J. WILLIAMS; BARBARA BUTLER; DEBRA GUTIERREZ; DEEPIKA PATEL; NATALIE BOURNE; LONNIECE SCOTT; BRIAN DONIVAN; KEITH SMITH; AMY FRAHER; CHRISTINA MANSER; DIANNE MATHENY; ELIZABETH WALLING; JENNIFER ASHCRAFT; KAREN ANDREAS-MOSES; KATHRYN DAVIS; LISA MORGAN; MARIA LAPAN; STEPHANIE ANELLO; DAWN COLLINS , Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 6:14-cv-149-Orl-37GJK HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER This cause is before the Court on the following: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements of Arbitration Claims and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 257), filed August 2, 2016; 2. U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 259), filed September 23, 2016; and 3. The parties’ Joint Notice of No Objection to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation for Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements of Arbitration Claims (Doc. 260), filed September 26, 2016. In the instant collective action, a multitude of plaintiffs assert violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) against Defendant. (See Doc. 51.) Of these plaintiffs, Defendant maintained that the claims of Carmen Flores, 1 Susan O’Hearn, and Farrell Prudent (“Arbitration Plaintiffs”) were subject to arbitration and moved for dismissal of such claims. (See Doc. 68.) Upon consideration, the Court granted Defendant’s motion and ordered the Arbitration Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims against Defendant individually. (Doc. 85.) On July 27, 2016, Defendant notified the Court that it had reached settlement agreements (“Agreements”) with each of the Arbitration Plaintiffs. (Doc. 256; see also Docs. 257-1, 257-2, 257-3.) The parties then jointly moved for approval of such Agreements. (Doc. 257 (“Motion for Approval”).) 1 Carmen Flores was not named as a plaintiff in the most recent amended complaint and was terminated as party shortly after it was filed. (See Doc. 51.) 2 In a well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly recommends that the Court approve the Agreements. (Doc. 259 (“R&R”).) Magistrate Judge Kelly also recommends that the Court deny the portion of the Motion for Approval which requests that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement. (Id.) On September 26, 2016, Defendant and the Arbitration Plaintiffs jointly filed a notice of no objection to the R&R. (Doc. 259.) Upon consideration, and in the absence of any objection, the Court finds that the R&R is due to be adopted, confirmed and made a part of this Order. The parties’ Motion for Approval is, therefore, due to be granted to the extent recommended in the R&R. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 259) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. The parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlements of Arbitration Claims and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 257) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. To the extent the parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the Agreements, the Motion is DENIED. b. 3. In all other respects, the Motion is GRANTED. The Arbitration Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on October 3, 2016. 3 Copies: Counsel of Record 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?