Harper v. The Florida Bar et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by David A. Harper. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 12/23/2014. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION DAVID A. HARPER, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:14-cv-1327-Orl-40GJK THE FLORIDA BAR, JOANN MARIE STALCUP, JAMES PERRY, ALAN DICKEY, NANCY ALLEY, CLAYTON SIMMONS, ROBERT WOHN, JR. , GEORGE MAXWELL, ROBERT HAWLEY, ROBERT PEGG, STEVEN LEVIN, JANICE BUCHMAN, JOHN PAPPAS, BUTLER PAPPAS WEIHMULLER KATZ CRAIG LLP, JUDITH KINNEY, JEAN DUBINSKI, KELLY JO (HEISER) HEINZ, JAMES PARTLOW, SCLAFANI WILLIAMS COURT REPORTERS, ACCURATE COURT REPORTERS, RITA MOTT, RITA MEYER, FLORIDA HOSPITAL, DOCTOR LABIODA, DOCTOR OVERMEYER, DOCTOR CHANDHRAY, DOCTOR SHEPARD, THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COURT, THE COLORADO OFFICE OF ATTORNEY REGULATION, THE COLORADO OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, Defendants. ORDER This cause is before the Court on period review. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the case be dismissed without prejudice. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed December 2, 2014 (Doc. 4), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 3. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 23, 2014. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?