Harper v. The Florida Bar et al
Filing
5
ORDER adopting 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by David A. Harper. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 12/23/2014. (MMW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
DAVID A. HARPER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:14-cv-1327-Orl-40GJK
THE FLORIDA BAR, JOANN MARIE
STALCUP, JAMES PERRY, ALAN
DICKEY, NANCY ALLEY, CLAYTON
SIMMONS, ROBERT WOHN, JR. ,
GEORGE MAXWELL, ROBERT
HAWLEY, ROBERT PEGG, STEVEN
LEVIN, JANICE BUCHMAN, JOHN
PAPPAS, BUTLER PAPPAS
WEIHMULLER KATZ CRAIG LLP,
JUDITH KINNEY, JEAN DUBINSKI,
KELLY JO (HEISER) HEINZ, JAMES
PARTLOW, SCLAFANI WILLIAMS
COURT REPORTERS, ACCURATE
COURT REPORTERS, RITA MOTT,
RITA MEYER, FLORIDA HOSPITAL,
DOCTOR LABIODA, DOCTOR
OVERMEYER, DOCTOR
CHANDHRAY, DOCTOR SHEPARD,
THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE
ASSOCIATION, THE STATE BAR OF
CALIFORNIA, THE CALIFORNIA
STATE BAR COURT, THE COLORADO
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY
REGULATION, THE COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING
DISCIPLINARY JUDGE and DOES 1
THROUGH 20,
Defendants.
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on period review. The United States Magistrate
Judge has submitted a report recommending that the case be dismissed without
prejudice.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that
no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation filed December 2, 2014 (Doc. 4), is
ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
3.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 23, 2014.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?