Murphy v. Acumed, LLC

Filing 9

ORDER denying 3 Motion to Remand to State Court and staying effect of order for ten (10) days to permit Plaintiff time to file stipulation. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 12/8/2014. (JU)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JOHN E. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:14-cv-1842-Orl-31DAB ACUMED, LLC, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 3) and Defendant’s Response (Doc. 8). By his Complaint (Doc. 2), Plaintiff seeks damages against Defendant in excess of $15,000 for a clavicle plating system manufactured by Defendant that had been implanted in Plaintiff as a result of a prior accident. Plaintiff alleges that the clavicle plate broke, causing Plaintiff to suffer bodily injury, and resulting in pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, mental anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life and the potential expense of hospitalization and medical care (Doc. 2, paragraph 11). Plaintiff claims that these losses are either permanent or continuing. In his objection to removal (construed as a motion to remand), Plaintiff simply asserts that he is seeking less than $75,000.00 and therefore the case should be remanded to state court for failure to meet the federal court’s jurisdictional threshold. 1 1 Plaintiff’s mere post-removal In paragraph 6 of his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that there is diversity between Plaintiff and Defendant. statement, however, is not enough to defeat federal jurisdiction in light of the serious bodily injury asserted in his Complaint. Currently, the Court finds that the face of the Complaint asserts a claim that meets the amount in controversy threshold and the removing Defendant has met its burden. However, the Plaintiff may file a stipulation to the effect that at the time of removal the amount in controversy did not exceed $75,000.00 exclusive of interest and taxable costs and that Plaintiff will not accept an award in excess of $75,000.00. C.f. Spencer v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, No. CIV.A. 14-0380CG-N, 2014 WL 5335825, at *3 (S.D. Ala. Oct. 20, 2014) (discussing plaintiff’s stipulations agreeing to never seek damages or accept amounts in settlement or judgment in excess of $72,500.00 where stipulations were unrevokable and binding on heirs and assigns). The Court will stay the effect of this Order for ten (10) days pending the filing of said stipulation. It is therefore, ORDERED that the Motion to Remand, (Doc. 3), is DENIED. The effect of this Order is stayed for ten (10) days, should the Plaintiff fail to file any additional documentation this Order will become final. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on December 8, 2014. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?