Roell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Filing 31

ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 1/30/2015. (VMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CARMEN ROELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:14-cv-1914-Orl-37DAB STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE; and WANNA J. PIERRE, Defendants. ORDER This cause is before the Court on the following: 1. Order to Show Cause (Doc. 28), filed January 23, 2015; and 2. Defendant-State Farm’s Response to Order to Show Cause (Doc. 29), filed January 23, 2015. On January 23, 2015, the Court ordered the removing Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (“Defendant”), to show cause why the Court should not remand this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See Doc. 28.) In response, Defendant concedes that Plaintiff’s filing of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 26), which incorporates Wanna J. Pierre as a co-defendant, divested the Court of diversity jurisdiction over this action. (See Doc. 29, p. 1.) Plaintiff and Pierre are both citizens of Florida, so the addition of Pierre as a co-defendant defeats complete diversity. See Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 89 (2005) (requiring that the citizenship of each plaintiff be diverse form the citizenship of every defendant). Consequently, the case is due to be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on January 30, 2015. Copies: Counsel of Record Clerk of Court for the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?