Wall-Desousa et al v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles et al
Filing
34
ORDER that the Court will not exercise its discretion to stay the case and all deadlines for responding to the Amended Complaint are in effect; denying as moot 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and terminating Defendants who were voluntarily dismissed by way of the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/23/2015. (KMS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
DANIEL WALL-DESOUSA and SCOTT
WALL-DESOUSA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No: 6:14-cv-1959-Orl-41DAB
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR
VEHICLES, TERRY L. RHODES,
DIANNE DOWMAN, RICK SCOTT,
MAUREEN JOHNSON and CLAYTON
BOYD WALDEN,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Doc. 31), filed on
January 23, 2015. Upon consideration thereof, the Court will not exercise its discretion to stay the
case, and all deadlines for responding to the Amended Complaint, as provided in the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, are in effect. (Cf. Order, Doc. 10, at 5 (suspending prior deadlines)).
The Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 2) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed
to TERMINATE the following Defendants, who were voluntarily dismissed by way of the
Amended Complaint: Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Terry L.
Page 1 of 2
Rhodes, and Rick Scott. The Clerk is also directed to change Defendant Dianne Dowman’s name
to Dianne Bowman 1 and to amend the case style in accordance with the above.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 23, 2015.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
1
According to the most recent document filed by this Defendant, her last name is Bowman.
(Compare Def. Bowman Br., Doc. 27, at 1, with Verified Compl., Doc. 1, ¶ 13, and Resp. to Mot.
Expedite, Doc. 22, at 1).
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?