Woodman v. Bravo Brio Restaurant Group, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER denying as moot 6 Motion to Strike ; denying without prejudice 9 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 12/11/2014. (Smith, Thomas)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
AGNES C. WOODMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 6:14-cv-2025-Orl-40TBS

BRAVO BRIO RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
ORDER
This case comes before the Court on Defendant, Bravo Rio Restaurant Group,
Inc.’s Motion to Strike Paragraph 9(i) and any Allegations for Negligent Mode of
Operation (Doc. 6), and Defendant, Bravo Rio Restaurant Group, Inc.’s Motion to
Strike Paragraph 9(i) and any Allegations for Negligent Mode of Operation (Doc. 9).
The motion at docket entry 6 is DENIED as moot because it was superseded
by the motion filed at docket entry 9, and because it does not comply with M.D. Fla.
Rule 3.01(g).
The motion at docket entry 9 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because it
does not comply with M.D. Fla. Rule 3.01(g).
DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida, on December 11, 2014.

Copies to all Counsel