Lengua v. Uno Restaurants, LLC.

Filing 26

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to extend time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 10/23/2015. (Smith, Thomas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ANDRES LENGUA, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:15-cv-57-Orl-22TBS UNO RESTAURANTS, LLC., Defendant. ORDER This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Pretrial Deadlines (Doc. 25). Defendant is asking the Court to cancel all case management deadlines, take the case off its trial calendar, and not reschedule the case until 60 days after it decides Defendant’s motion to compel (Id., at 2). The Case Management and Scheduling Order governing this case provides that “[m]otions to extend the dispositive motions deadline or to continue the trial are generally denied.” (Doc. 20 at 4). And that “[t]he Court will grant an exception only when necessary to prevent manifest injustice.” (Id.). The Order goes on to state that “[m]otions for an extension of other deadlines established in this order, including motions for an extension of the discovery period, are disfavored. The deadline will not be extended absent a showing of good cause.” (Id.). The grounds for Defendant’s motion don’t come anywhere close to showing manifest injustice and the existence of good cause is debatable. Defendant’s motion to compel became ripe on October 20, 2015 and will be decided in the regular course of business. In the meantime, the Court will assist the parties by GRANTING the motion in part, by extending the deadlines for the filing of dispositive and Daubert motions from November 2 to December 1, 2015. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. The parties should be prepared to go to trial during the period beginning April 1, 2016. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on October 23, 2015. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?