Palomares v. Feliciano et al

Filing 35

ORDER granting in part 33 Motion for Settlement; The parties' agreement is APPROVED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Adopting Report and Recommendations -re 34 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 2/11/2016. (DJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MIGUEL PALOMARES and RICHARD FELICIANO, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 6:15-cv-340-Orl-41KRS KISSIMMEE PRODUCE, INC. and VITOR CORTES, Defendants. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement (Doc. 33). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34), which recommends that the parties’ motion be granted in part, that the Court find that the parties’ agreement is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute, and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. After an independent de novo review of the record and noting that no objections were timely filed, this Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part; the parties’ agreement is APPROVED; and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Page 1 of 2 DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on February 11, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?