Colom v. Walsh et al
Filing
4
ORDER adopting and confirming 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying without prejudice 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jose Datil Colom. No later than May 8, 2015 Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint, and eith er pay the filing fee or file a new motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a completed affidavit of indigency. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in this case being dismissed for lack of prosecution, without further notice. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 4/16/2015. (SR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
JOSE DATIL COLOM,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:15-cv-481-Orl-22TBS
KEVIN WALSH, BUDDY DYER, GINA
BERNARD and CITY OF ORLANDO
CERTIFICATION BOARD,
Defendants.
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc.
No. 2) filed on March 25, 2015.
The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the
Motion be DENIED without prejudice.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no
objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions
of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation filed March 25, 2015 (Doc. No. 3), is
ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
The Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED without
prejudice.
3.
No later than May 8, 2015 Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint, and either
pay the filing fee or file a new motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a completed
affidavit of indigency.
4.
Failure to comply with this Order shall result in this case being dismissed for lack
of prosecution, without further notice.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on April 16, 2015.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?