Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
29
ORDER adopting 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Renee D. Bell. The final decision of the Commissioner awarding a closed period of disability benefits is hereby REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the file. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 8/23/2016. (LAM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
RENEE D. BELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:15-cv-706-Orl-22GJK
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's appeal from a final decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security awarding her a closed period of disability benefits.
The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the
Commissioner’s final decision be reversed and remanded for further proceedings, pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no
objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions
of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation filed August 8, 2016 (Doc. No. 28), is
ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
The final decision of the Commissioner awarding a closed period of disability
benefits is hereby REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to
sentence four of Section 405(g).
3.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Claimant and against the
Commissioner.
4.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on August 23, 2016.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?