Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

ORDER granting 12 Motion to Remand to Commissioner of Social Security; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 15 Report and Recommendations. The prior decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and, thereafter, to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 9/8/2015. (DJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION LADEAN LAVICE FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:15-cv-819-Orl-41TBS COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 12). United States Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15), which recommends that the motion be granted and that this Court reverse and remand this case to the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). After an independent de novo review of the record and noting that no objections were timely filed, this Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. 3. The prior decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for “further evaluat[ion] [of] Plaintiff’s Page 1 of 2 residual functional capacity and if necessary, obtain[ing] evidence from a vocational expert.” (Mot. Entry J. with Remand at 1). 4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and, thereafter, to close this case. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on September 6, 2015. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?