Holley v. Sebek Kirkman LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER adopting 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval filed by Cassandra Holley. The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 6/13/2016. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CASSANDRA HOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:15-cv-1626-Orl-40GJK SEBEK KIRKMAN LLC and NICOLA O. SWABY, Defendants. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. 22) filed on April 5, 2016. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed May 26, 2016 (Doc. 23), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. 22) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 3. Plaintiff’s general release (Doc. 22-1 at ¶ 1), the confidentiality provision (Doc. 22-1 at ¶ 5), and the mutual non-disparagement covenant (Doc. 22-1 at ¶ 7) are STRICKEN from the Agreement. 4. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. 22) is GRANTED to the extent that the Court finds the Agreement (Doc. 22-1), with the modifications set forth above, to be a fair and reasonable compromise of Plaintiff’s FLSA claims. 5. The Motion is otherwise DENIED. 6. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 7. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on June 13, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?