Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendations. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/17/2017. (VMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION EDWARD TORRES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:15-cv-1911-Orl-37DCI COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER This cause is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20), filed January 12, 2017. Plaintiff Edward Torres initiated this action for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) concerning Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. (See Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick, who issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), which advised the Court to reverse and remand the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 20.) The January 30, 2017 deadline to file any objections to the Report has passed, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and no objections were filed. Absent objections, and upon consideration, the Court finds that Magistrate Judge Irick’s thorough and well-reasoned Report is due to be adopted and confirmed. CONCLUSION Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter Judgment for the Plaintiff and to CLOSE this case. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on February 17, 2017. Copies: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?