Barroso v. Gilson's International Cuisine, Inc. et al
Filing
19
ORDER granting 14 Joint Motion for Settlement Approval and adopting 17 U.S. Magistrate Judge David A. Baker's Report and Recommendation. The Settlement Agreement and Release of FLSA Claims (Doc. 14-1) is approved. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 4/29/2016. (SN)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
ALEXANDRE BARROSO,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 6:16-cv-69-Orl-37DAB
GILSON’S INTERNATIONAL CUISINE,
INC.; and GILSON RODRIGUES,
Defendants.
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the following:
1.
The Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law (Doc. 14), filed March 28, 2016.
2.
U.S. Magistrate Judge David A. Baker’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 17), filed April 26, 2016.
3.
The Parties’ Joint Notice of Non-Objection to Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 18), filed April 28, 2016.
Pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Plaintiff initiated the instant
action against his former employers for unpaid overtime compensation. (See Doc. 1.) On
March 2, 2016, Defendants notified the Court that the parties had reached a settlement.
(Doc. 12.) The parties now jointly move for approval of their settlement agreement
(“Agreement”). (Doc. 14 (“Motion”).) The Motion was referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge
David. A. Baker for a report and recommendation.
In actions brought directly by current and former employees against their
employers for unpaid wages under the FLSA, district courts must scrutinize any
settlement “for fairness” before entering a stipulated judgment. See Nall v. Mal-Motels,
Inc., 723 F.3d 1304, 1306–07 (11th Cir. 2013); see also Wolff v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc.,
545 F. App’x 791, 793 (11th Cir. 2013). Specifically, the Court must determine that any
settlement “is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA
provisions.” Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350,
1355 (11th Cir. 1982).
Upon review of the Motion, Agreement, and documentation of attorney’s fees,
Magistrate Judge Baker recommends that the Court accept the Agreement as a fair and
reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA issues. (Doc. 17 (“R&R”).) The
parties do not object to the R&R, and they request that the Court adopt the R&R, grant
the Motion, and dismiss the case with prejudice. (Doc. 18.)
Having independently reviewed the R&R for fairness, and in the absence of any
objection, this Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Baker and adopts the R&R in its
entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (suggesting that a de novo review is only required
when a party objects to the proposed findings and recommendations).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
U.S. Magistrate Judge David A. Baker’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 17) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
The Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Incorporated
Memorandum of Law (Doc. 14) is GRANTED.
3.
The Settlement Agreement and Release of FLSA Claims (Doc. 14-1) is
2
APPROVED.
4.
The Court declines to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the
Settlement Agreement (Doc 14-1).
5.
The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
6.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on April 29, 2016.
Copies:
Counsel of Record
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?