United States of America v. Collazo et al
Filing
31
ORDER granting 23 Motion for Default Judgment; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 26 Report and Recommendations. Entry of a final judgment against Defendant Humberto Collazo, Sr., in the amount of $2,727,214.54, plus statutory interest pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6621, 6622, accruing from April 15, 2016 until paid, will be deferred until all claims in this matter have been resolved. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/26/2016. (DJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:16-cv-339-Orl-41DAB
HUMBERTO COLLAZO, SR. and ANA
R. RIVERA,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Default Judgment
Against Humberto Collazo, Sr. (“Motion,” Doc. 23). United States Magistrate Judge David A.
Baker has submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26), recommending that the Motion be
granted, with a final judgment being entered upon resolution of the remaining claims.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no
objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the analysis set forth in the Report and
Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and
made a part of this Order.
2. The United States’ Motion for Default Judgment Against Humberto Collazo, Sr.
(Doc. 23) is GRANTED.
3. Entry of a final judgment against Defendant Humberto Collazo, Sr., in the amount
of $2,727,214.54, plus statutory interest pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6621, 6622,
Page 1 of 2
accruing from April 15, 2016 until paid, will be deferred until all claims in this
matter have been resolved.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on October 26, 2016.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?