Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 0.567 Acres Of Land in Osceola County Florida et al
Filing
36
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff shall post a proper security bond with the Clerk of this Court in the amount of $153,600.00. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 6/3/2016. (VMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION, LLC,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 6:16-cv-475-Orl-31-DAB
v.
Tract Nos: FL-OS-052.001, FL-OS-053.000
+/- 0.567 ACRES OF LAND IN
OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA;
SINCLAIR ROAD (ORLANDO)
ASLI VII, LLC; INTRAM INVESTMENTS,
INC.; and UNKNOWN OWNERS, IF ANY,
Defendants.
____________________________________
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the following matters:
(1)
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Determining the Right to Condemn
Easements and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 2), filed
March 18, 2016;
(2)
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction for Immediate Possession and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 3), filed March 18, 2016; and
(3)
Stipulation for Immediate Possession (Doc. 29), filed May 5, 2016.
BACKGROUND
On February 2, 2016, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”)
issued an order which, among other things, granted to Plaintiff Sabal Trail Transmission,
LLC (“Plaintiff”) a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (“FERC Certificate”),
authorizing Plaintiff to construct and operate facilities for transporting natural gas in
interstate commerce—the Sabal Trail Project (“Project”). (See Doc. 1; Doc. 1-5.)
Pursuant to the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 717–717z (“Gas Act”), and based on the
FERC Certificate, Plaintiff filed several land condemnation actions throughout the
U.S. District Courts for the Middle District of Florida (“M.D. Courts”) to acquire the
easements necessary to complete the Project. (Doc. 1.) With its Complaint in this action
against property located in Osceola County, Florida, Sinclair Road (Orlando) ASLI VII,
LLC (“Sinclair”) and Intram Investments (“Intram”), Plaintiff also filed:
1.
A description of the largest parcel of land at issue in this action
(Doc. 1-2 (“Parcel”));
2.
A proposed “Grant of Easement” with easement drawings (Doc. 1-3
(“Subject Easements”));
3.
A copy of the FERC Certificate (Doc. 1-5);
4.
copy of the Notice of Condemnation in accordance with the
requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 71.1(c)(4) and
71.1(d)(2) (Doc. 1-6 (“Condemnation Notice”));
5.
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Determining the Right to
Condemn Easements and Incorporated Memorandum of Law
(Doc. 2 (“Rule 56 Motion”)); and
6.
Motion for Preliminary Injunction for Immediate Possession and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 3 (“Rule 65 Motion”)).
In support of the Rule 56 and Rule 65 Motions, Plaintiff also filed sworn
Declarations from the Right-of-Way Project Manager (Doc. 4), the Construction Project
Manager (Doc. 6), and the Project Director (Doc. 5). On May 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed the
Declaration of its counsel (Doc. 33), which set out appraised values for the Parcels at
issue in this action and in other actions pending in the M.D. Courts.
In accordance with Rule 71.1(d)(3), Plaintiff served the Condemnation Notice on
Defendants. (Docs. 13, 20.) Sinclair appeared (Doc. 18), Answered the Complaint
(Doc. 26), attended a hearing in this action on May 23, 2016 (“Hearing” (Doc. 34)), and
2
filed a Stipulation for Immediate Possession, which confirms Plaintiff’s rights to condemn
and immediate possession (“Stipulation”). (Doc. 29.) Although more than 21 days have
passed since Plaintiff served Intram (Doc. 20), Intram has not filed a response or an
answer in this action, and it did not attend the Hearing. 1 (See Docs. 30 & 32.)
Upon review, the Court agrees with other judges in the M.D. Courts that Plaintiff’s
Rule 56 and Rule 65 Motions are due to be granted. See Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC
v. +/- 0.9 Acres of Land in Citrus Cnty., Fla., Case No. 5:16-cv-196-Oc-30-PRL, 2016 WL
2997669, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 25, 2016); Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC, v. +/- 9.669
Acres of Land in Polk Cnty., Fla., Case No. 8:16-cv-640-T-33-EAP, 2016 WL 2745082,
at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 11, 2016).
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 2) is GRANTED in
that the Court finds that Plaintiff has the right to condemn the Subject
Easements.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Immediate Possession
(Doc. 3) is GRANTED.
3.
Upon Plaintiff posting a proper security bond with the Clerk of this Court in
the amount of $153,600.00, the following shall occur:
a.
Plaintiff shall have immediate access to, and possession of,
1
After being served with a notice of condemnation or “taking” as required by Rule
71.1(d), defendants who have “an objection or defense to the taking must serve an
answer within 21 days after being served.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 71(e)(2). Objections and
defenses that are not set forth in an answer are waived. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 71.1(e)(3).
3
the
Subject
Easements
described
in
the
Notice
of
Condemnation (Doc. 1-5) and incorporated herein; and
b.
Plaintiff may immediately begin pre-installation activities so
that
construction-related
activities
can
commence
by
June 21, 2016, for the purposes of constructing the Project.
4.
All pre-installation and construction-related activities shall be consistent
with the FERC Certificate and all other applicable regulatory permits.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on June 3, 2016.
Copies:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
Senior U.S. District Court Judge Gregory A. Presnell
Magistrate Judge David A. Baker
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?