Oy Ajat Ltd. v. Genoray Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 82

ORDERED that on or before Wednesday, January 25, 2017, the parties are DIRECTED to show cause by written response why the pending motions should not be terminated without prejudice in light of the parties' agreement to settle this action. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 1/23/2017. (VMF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
OY AJAT LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 6:16-cv-869-Orl-37DCI

GENORAY CO. LTD.; GENORAY
AMERICA, INC.; and PROFESSIONAL
SALES AND CONSULTANT GROUP,
INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on its own motion.
On January 19, 2017, the parties to this patent infringement action moved for the
extension of certain deadlines in their claim construction briefing schedule. (Doc. 80
(“Motion for Extension”).) As grounds for the motion, the parties represented that they
had reached a “settlement in principle” and “are in the process of finalizing the terms of a
written settlement agreement and consent judgment papers.” (Id.) U.S. Magistrate Judge
Daniel C. Irick granted the Motion for Extension on January 20, 2017. (Doc. 81.)
Nonetheless, several motions remain pending in this action. (See Docs. 55, 56,
60, 76.) In the interest of preserving judicial resources, on or before Wednesday,
January 25, 2017, the parties are DIRECTED to show cause by written response why
the pending motions should not be terminated without prejudice in light of the parties’
agreement to settle this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on January 23, 2017.

Copies:
Counsel of Record

2