Oy Ajat Ltd. v. Genoray Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 82

ORDERED that on or before Wednesday, January 25, 2017, the parties are DIRECTED to show cause by written response why the pending motions should not be terminated without prejudice in light of the parties' agreement to settle this action. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 1/23/2017. (VMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION OY AJAT LTD., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:16-cv-869-Orl-37DCI GENORAY CO. LTD.; GENORAY AMERICA, INC.; and PROFESSIONAL SALES AND CONSULTANT GROUP, INC., Defendants. ORDER This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On January 19, 2017, the parties to this patent infringement action moved for the extension of certain deadlines in their claim construction briefing schedule. (Doc. 80 (“Motion for Extension”).) As grounds for the motion, the parties represented that they had reached a “settlement in principle” and “are in the process of finalizing the terms of a written settlement agreement and consent judgment papers.” (Id.) U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick granted the Motion for Extension on January 20, 2017. (Doc. 81.) Nonetheless, several motions remain pending in this action. (See Docs. 55, 56, 60, 76.) In the interest of preserving judicial resources, on or before Wednesday, January 25, 2017, the parties are DIRECTED to show cause by written response why the pending motions should not be terminated without prejudice in light of the parties’ agreement to settle this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on January 23, 2017. Copies: Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?