Blakely v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
ORDER granting 21 Unopposed Request for Authorization to Charge a Reasonable Fee; adopting Report and Recommendations re 22 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/11/2020. (BIA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
SARAH BLAKELY,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 6:16-cv-987-Orl-37GJK
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
_____________________________________
ORDER
Plaintiff’s attorney, Richard A. Culbertson (“Culbertson”), filed an unopposed
request for authorization to charge Plaintiff attorney’s fees. (Doc. 21 (“Motion”).)
Culbertson seeks $3,440.43, equaling 25% of Plaintiff’s past-due benefits per a
contingency agreement, minus the Equal Access to Justice Act fees awarded. (Id. ¶¶ 1, 3.)
On referral, United States Magistrate David A. Baker recommends granting the Motion.
(Doc. 22 (“R&R”).)
The parties filed a joint notice of no objection to the R&R. (Doc. 23.) Absent
objection, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan 28, 2016); see
also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the
Court finds that the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1.
U.S. Magistrate Judge David A. Baker’s Report and Recommendation
-1-
(Doc. 22) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order.
2.
Richard A. Culbertson’s Unopposed Request for Authorization to Charge a
Reasonable Fee (Doc. 21) is GRANTED.
3.
Richard A. Culbertson is AUTHORIZED to charge Plaintiff Sarah Blakely
$3,440.43 in attorney’s fees.
4.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on February 11, 2020.
Copies to:
Counsel of Record
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?