Blakely v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

ORDER granting 21 Unopposed Request for Authorization to Charge a Reasonable Fee; adopting Report and Recommendations re 22 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/11/2020. (BIA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SARAH BLAKELY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:16-cv-987-Orl-37GJK COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _____________________________________ ORDER Plaintiff’s attorney, Richard A. Culbertson (“Culbertson”), filed an unopposed request for authorization to charge Plaintiff attorney’s fees. (Doc. 21 (“Motion”).) Culbertson seeks $3,440.43, equaling 25% of Plaintiff’s past-due benefits per a contingency agreement, minus the Equal Access to Justice Act fees awarded. (Id. ¶¶ 1, 3.) On referral, United States Magistrate David A. Baker recommends granting the Motion. (Doc. 22 (“R&R”).) The parties filed a joint notice of no objection to the R&R. (Doc. 23.) Absent objection, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the Court finds that the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge David A. Baker’s Report and Recommendation -1- (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. Richard A. Culbertson’s Unopposed Request for Authorization to Charge a Reasonable Fee (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. 3. Richard A. Culbertson is AUTHORIZED to charge Plaintiff Sarah Blakely $3,440.43 in attorney’s fees. 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on February 11, 2020. Copies to: Counsel of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?