Borloglou v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.
Filing
15
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations - re 13 Report and Recommendations. Defendant's Objections (Doc. 14) are OVERRULED. This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida--Case No. 2016-CA-1323-OC. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/5/2016. (DJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
PATRICIA BORLOGLOU,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:16-cv-1018-Orl-41DAB
STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on U.S. Magistrate Judge David A. Baker’s Report and
Recommendation (the “R&R,” Doc. 13), which recommends that this case be remanded for lack
of subject-matter jurisdiction. Removing-Defendant purports to object to the R&R. (See Doc. 14).
A district court is required to review de novo the objected-to portions of a magistrate
judge’s recommendation and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part” the
recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). For the reasons stated
in the July 25, 2016 Order, Belmonte v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc., 6:16-cv-488-Orl-41KRS
(M.D. Fla.) (Doc. 17), Defendant’s objections will be overruled.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and
made a part of this Order.
2. Defendant’s Objections (Doc. 14) are OVERRULED.
3. This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and
for Osceola County, Florida—Case No. 2016-CA-1323-OC.
4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
Page 1 of 2
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on August 5, 2016.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Clerk of the Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?