Borloglou v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations - re 13 Report and Recommendations. Defendant's Objections (Doc. 14) are OVERRULED. This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida--Case No. 2016-CA-1323-OC. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 8/5/2016. (DJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION PATRICIA BORLOGLOU, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:16-cv-1018-Orl-41DAB STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on U.S. Magistrate Judge David A. Baker’s Report and Recommendation (the “R&R,” Doc. 13), which recommends that this case be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Removing-Defendant purports to object to the R&R. (See Doc. 14). A district court is required to review de novo the objected-to portions of a magistrate judge’s recommendation and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part” the recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). For the reasons stated in the July 25, 2016 Order, Belmonte v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc., 6:16-cv-488-Orl-41KRS (M.D. Fla.) (Doc. 17), Defendant’s objections will be overruled. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. Defendant’s Objections (Doc. 14) are OVERRULED. 3. This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida—Case No. 2016-CA-1323-OC. 4. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Page 1 of 2 DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on August 5, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Clerk of the Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Osceola County, Florida Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?