Waldrop v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 23 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/18/2017. (VMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
WANDA MARIE WALDROP,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 6:16-cv-1221-Orl-37DCI
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick (Doc. 23), filed August 15, 2017.
Plaintiff Wanda Marie Waldrop initiated this action for review of a final decision
of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s claim for
disability insurance benefits (“Decision”). (See Doc. 1, ¶¶ 4, 5.) The matter was reassigned
to U.S. Magistrate Daniel C. Irick (Doc. 15), who issued a Report and Recommendation
(“Report”), recommending that the Court affirm the Decision. (Doc. 23.) The deadline to
file objections to the Report has now passed, and no objections were filed. Absent
objections, the Court has examined the Report only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., No. 8:12 cv 557 T 27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see
also Marcort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no clear error, the
Court will adopt and confirm Magistrate Judge Irick’s well-reasoned Report.
-1-
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23)
is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.
3.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to: (a) enter Judgment for the Defendant
Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Wanda Marie
Waldrop; and (b) CLOSE this case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on September 18, 2017.
Copies:
Counsel of Record
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?