Waldrop v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

ORDER adopting 23 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 9/18/2017. (VMF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION WANDA MARIE WALDROP, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:16-cv-1221-Orl-37DCI COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER This cause is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick (Doc. 23), filed August 15, 2017. Plaintiff Wanda Marie Waldrop initiated this action for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits (“Decision”). (See Doc. 1, ¶¶ 4, 5.) The matter was reassigned to U.S. Magistrate Daniel C. Irick (Doc. 15), who issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that the Court affirm the Decision. (Doc. 23.) The deadline to file objections to the Report has now passed, and no objections were filed. Absent objections, the Court has examined the Report only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12 cv 557 T 27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Marcort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no clear error, the Court will adopt and confirm Magistrate Judge Irick’s well-reasoned Report. -1- CONCLUSION Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to: (a) enter Judgment for the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Wanda Marie Waldrop; and (b) CLOSE this case. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on September 18, 2017. Copies: Counsel of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?