Etienne v. The Devereux Foundation, Inc.

Filing 47

ORDER adopting 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 45 Joint MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically approve parties' settlement agreement filed by Crystal Etienne. The Parties' Joint Motion and Memorandum of Law for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. 45) is GRANTED as provided in the Order. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 8/23/2017. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CRYSTAL ETIENNE, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:16-cv-1251-Orl-40DCI THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION, INC., Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion and Memorandum of Law for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. 45) filed on July 26, 2017. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed August 8, 2017 (Doc. 46), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Parties' Joint Motion and Memorandum of Law for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. 45) is GRANTED. 3. The first sentence of the Agreement’s “Non-Disparagement” provision (Doc. 45-1 at 3) is STRICKEN. 4. The remainder of the Agreement (Doc. 45-1) is found to be a fair and reasonable settlement of Plaintiff’s FLSA claim. 5. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 6. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on August 23, 2017. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?