Fields, et al v. Diamond Resorts International, Inc, et al
Filing
60
ORDER adopting #59 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #58 JOINT MOTION for Settlement ApprovalJOINT MOTION to Dismiss lawsuit with Prejudice filed by Stephen Greninger, Justin Allis, Dianne Depietro, Ryan Petro, Robert Stone, Stephen Fields. The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and to Dismiss the Case without Prejudice is DENIED. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 4/10/2017. (MMW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
STEPHEN FIELDS, DIANNE
DEPIETRO, JUSTIN ALLIS, STEPHEN
GRENINGER, RYAN PETRO and
ROBERT STONE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No: 6:16-cv-1285-Orl-40TBS
DIAMOND RESORTS
INTERNATIONAL, INC., DIAMOND
RESORTS CORPORATION and
DIAMOND RESORTS
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, INC.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement
Agreement and to Dismiss the Case with Prejudice (Doc. 58) filed on March 16, 2017.
The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the
motion be denied.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that
no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation filed March 22, 2017 (Doc. 59), is
ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2.
The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and to Dismiss the
Case with Prejudice (Doc. 58) is DENIED.
3.
The Settlement Agreement is rejected without prejudice to renewal upon
clarification of the issues outlined in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 59) and
amendment of the settlement agreement, if appropriate.
DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on April 10, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?