Gill v. Steve Harper Painting, Inc. et al
Filing
32
ORDER granting in part 29 motion to approve revised settlement agreement. Paragraph 1.B. of the Settlement Agreement, (Doc. 29 at 5), to the extent it purports to release any claims other than those related to wages, and paragraph 14, (id. at 9), are STRICKEN. In all other respects, the parties' agreement is APPROVED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 30 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 6/12/2017. (DJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
DEAN GILL,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:16-cv-1335-Orl-41GJK
STEVE HARPER PAINTING, INC. and
STEVE HARPER,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Approve Revised
Settlement Agreement (Doc. 29). United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly issued a Report
and Recommendation (Doc. 30), which recommends that the parties’ motion be granted in part, to
which the parties filed a Joint Notice of Non-objection (Doc. 31).
After a de novo review of the record in this matter and noting the parties’ Joint Notice of
Non-objection, the Court agrees entirely with the analysis set forth in the Report and
Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and
made a part of this Order.
2. The Joint Motion to Approve Revised Settlement Agreement (Doc. 29) is
GRANTED in part.
3. Paragraph 1.B. of the Settlement Agreement, (Doc. 29 at 5), to the extent it purports
to release any claims other than those related to wages, and paragraph 14, (id. at 9),
Page 1 of 2
are STRICKEN. In all other respects, the parties’ agreement is APPROVED, and
this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on June 12, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?