Hinkle v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Filing
15
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 motion to dismiss; Defendant's motion is granted insofar as it requests that this Court compel arbitration and stay this case. It is denied in all other respects. The parties are directe d to proceed with arbitration, and they shall file a status report every ninety days from the date of this Order. This case is STAYED. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 13 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/13/2016. (DJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
JESSE HINKLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:16-cv-1453-Orl-41DCI
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel
Arbitration (Doc. 6). United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker issued a Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 13), which recommends granting the motion in part. After an independent
de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees
entirely with the analysis set forth in the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and
made part of this Order.
2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration (Doc. 6) is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part. Defendant’s motion is granted insofar as it requests
that this Court compel arbitration and stay this case. It is denied in all other respects.
3. The parties are directed to proceed with arbitration, and they shall file a status report
every ninety days from the date of this Order.
4. This case is STAYED.
5. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case.
Page 1 of 2
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on October 13, 2016.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?