Hinkle v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER granting 20 Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 21 Report and Recommendations. Insofar as the Settlement Agreement addresses Plaintiff's FLSA claims, and as amended by this Court, it is APPROVED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/25/2018. (DJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
JESSE HINKLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:16-cv-1453-Orl-41DCI
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and
Dismissal with Prejudice (“Motion,” Doc. 20). United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick
issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R,” Doc. 21), where he recommends granting the
Motion. After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the
Court agrees with the analysis in the R&R.
As noted in the R&R, there is consideration for the general release that is separate from
that being given in exchange for the settlement of Plaintiff’s FLSA claims. (Settlement Agreement,
Doc. 20-1, ¶ 1(c)). Pursuant to Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, this Court must determine
whether a proposed settlement “is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA
provisions.” 679 F.2d 1350, 1355 (11th Cir. 1982) (emphasis added). Moreover, “the release of
non-FLSA claims is generally not subject to judicial scrutiny.” Shearer v. Estep Const., Inc., No.
6:14-cv-1658-Orl-41GJK, 2015 WL 2402450, at *4 (M.D. Fla. May 20, 2015). Accordingly, this
Court does not express an opinion as to the validity of the separate general release agreement.
Additionally, this Court notes that to the extent that the Settlement Agreement purports to
allow the parties to subsequently modify the Settlement Agreement, (Doc. 20-1 ¶ 17), that
Page 1 of 2
language will be stricken. Pursuant to Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc., 679 F.2d at 1355, any future
modifications to the Settlement Agreement are unenforceable absent judicial approval.
Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and
made a part of this Order.
2. To the extent the modification provision (Doc. 20-1 ¶ 17) purports to allow the
Settlement Agreement to be modified without Court approval, it is STRICKEN.
3. The parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice
(Doc. 20) is GRANTED.
4. Insofar as the Settlement Agreement addresses Plaintiff’s FLSA claims, and as
amended by this Court, it is APPROVED.
5. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
6. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 25, 2018.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?