Woide et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association
Filing
31
ORDER denying 30 Motion to Reinstate Appeal. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 5/2/2017. (VMF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
In Re:
CHARLES EDWARD WOIDE; and
SUSANNAH CLARE WOIDE,
Debtors.
Bankr. Case No. 6:10-bk-22841-KSJ
_________________________________
CHARLES EDWARD WOIDE; and
SUSANNAH CLARE WOIDE,
Appellants,
v.
Case No. 6:16-cv-1484-Orl-37
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION,
Appellee.
____________________________________
ORDER
In the instant appeal, the Court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order and
dismissed the case. (Doc. 24 (“Dismissal Order”).) Thereafter, Appellants moved for
reconsideration of the Dismissal Order (Doc. 25), which the Court denied (Doc. 26
(“Denial Order”)). On February 17, 2017, Appellants filed a notice of appeal with the
U.S. Court Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit seeking to challenge the Denial Order
(“Appeal”). (Doc. 27.) Effective April 3, 2017, and pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rule
42-2(c), the Eleventh Circuit dismissed the Appeal for want of prosecution because
-1-
Appellants failed to timely file a brief. (See Doc. 29.) Appellants now move this Court to
reinstate the Appeal. (Doc. 30 (“Motion”).)
Of course, this Court does not have jurisdiction to direct the Eleventh Circuit to
reinstate an appeal. Both the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Eleventh
Circuit’s Rules contemplate that the Motion should have been filed with the Clerk for the
Eleventh Circuit. See Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(1); see also 11th Cir. R. 42-2(e). Hence the Motion
is due to be denied.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Appellants’ Emergency
Motion to Reinstate Appeal (Doc. 30) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on May 2, 2017.
Copies to:
Counsel of Record
Pro Se Parties
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?