Holmes v. Custom Cornhole Boards Incorporated

Filing 76

ORDER adopting 75 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 74 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval and Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Ulysses Holmes. The Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 74) is GRANTED IN PART. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 1/26/2018. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ULYSSES HOLMES and LAPHADRA HOLMES, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 6:16-cv-1507-Orl-40KRS CUSTOM CORNHOLE BOARDS INCORPORATED, Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on the parties’ Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 74) filed on January 4, 2018. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed January 11, 2018 (Doc. 75), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Court FINDS that the parties’ Settlement Agreement and Release of FLSA Claims (Doc. 74-1) is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute under the FLSA. 3. The Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 74) is GRANTED IN PART. The Court declines to reserve jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 26, 2018. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?