Saunders v. Commercial Companies, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 Joint MOTION for Settlement (to Approve Settlement Agreement & Incorporated Memorandum of Law) filed by Commercial Companies, Inc. See PDF for additional details. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 4/27/2017. (JLC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION HAHSHIM SAUNDERS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:16-cv-1865-Orl-22GJK COMMERCIAL COMPANIES, INC., Defendant. ORDER This cause is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement (Doc. No. 18) filed on March 27, 2017. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the Motion be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that the parties filed a Joint Notice of Non-Objection (Doc. No. 22), the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed April 17, 2017 (Doc. No. 20), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 3. The non-disparagement provision in the Agreement (Doc. No. 18 at 10, ¶7d, first sentence) is hereby STRICKEN. 4. The Court finds the Agreement (Doc. No. 18 at 6-11), with the modification set forth above, to be a fair and reasonable compromise of Plaintiff’s FLSA claims. 5. This case is DISMISSED WITH PRJUDICE. 6. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on April 27, 2017. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?