Galasso v. SascoSports, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER granting 32 Renewed Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice; adopting 34 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 11/14/2017. (KMS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION BRIAN GALASSO, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:16-cv-2035-Orl-41KRS SASCOSPORTS, INC., Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties’ Renewed Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice (“Renewed Motion,” Doc. 32). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R,” Doc. 34), in which she recommends that the Renewed Motion be granted in part. Specifically, Judge Spaulding recommends that the Court strike the modification provision from the Settlement Agreement, find that the settlement of the FLSA claim is reasonable, approve the parties’ Settlement Agreement as modified, and dismiss the case with prejudice. (Id. at 8). After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, this Court agrees with the analysis in the R&R. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made part of this Order. 2. To the extent the modification provision (Doc. 27-1 ¶ 12) purports to allow the Settlement Agreement to be modified without Court approval, it is STRICKEN. Page 1 of 2 3. The parties’ Renewed Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 32) is GRANTED; the Settlement Agreement, as amended by this Court, is APPROVED; and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The Clerk is directed to close this case. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on November 14, 2017. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?