Silva v. Nona Digital, Inc et al

Filing 39

ORDER adopting 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 34 Joint MOTION for Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Jonathan Silva, 36 Response filed by Jonathan Silva. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 34) is GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 3/9/2018. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JONATHAN SILVA, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:17-cv-544-Orl-40TBS NONA DIGITAL, INC, DAVID D. PAVLIK and MOSES VIRELLA, Defendants. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 34) filed on February 6, 2018. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the amended settlement agreement be approved. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that a Joint Notice of No Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) was filed on March 8, 2018, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed March 1, 2018 (Doc. 37), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 34) is GRANTED. 3. The amended settlement agreement (Doc. 36-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute under the FLSA. 4. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on March 9, 2018. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?