Coates v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER adopting 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Nicole Marie Coates. The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with Remand to the Defendant (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. The Cl erk is DIRECTED to enter judgment REVERSING the Commissioner of Social Security's final decision and REMANDING the case for further proceedings. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 11/16/2017. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION NICOLE MARIE COATES, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:17-cv-791-Orl-40GJK COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with Remand to the Defendant (Doc. 17) filed on November 13, 2017. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that a Joint Statement in Response to the Report and Recommendation of no objection was filed (Doc. 19), the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed November 14, 2017 (Doc. 18), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with Remand to the Defendant (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment REVERSING the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision and REMANDING the case for further proceedings. 4. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on November 16, 2017. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?