Richardson v. Park Soleil Vacation Owners Association, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER denying 2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 14 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 12/13/2017. (DJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
LENIR RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:17-cv-940-Orl-41TBS
PARK SOLEIL VACATION OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., THE TUSCANY
VILLAGE VACATION SUITES
OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and
PARK HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court
Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“Application,” Doc. 2). United States Magistrate Judge Thomas
B. Smith submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14), in which he recommends that the
Application be denied and that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) be dismissed without
leave to amend. Plaintiff filed a timely Objection (Doc. 17).
After a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees entirely with the analysis in the
Report and Recommendation. Taking all of Plaintiff’s allegations in the light most favorable to
her, including the additional information provided in Plaintiff’s Objection, Plaintiff has still failed
to establish that this Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the asserted claims. To the
extent that Plaintiff attempts to assert state law claims, Plaintiff has failed to allege diversity of
citizenship between herself and Defendants to establish diversity jurisdiction. Specifically,
Plaintiff has not alleged where Defendants are incorporated or where their principal place of
business is located. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1) (“[A] corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen
Page 1 of 3
of every State and foreign state by which it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state
where it has its principal place of business . . . .”); see also Idearc Media Corp. v. TSG Media, Inc.,
No. 09-60325-CIV, 2009 WL 546433, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 4, 2009) (dismissing case for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction where the complaint failed to allege a party’s citizenship). Furthermore,
in her Objection, Plaintiff, a citizen of Virginia, (see Doc. 10 at 2), admits that Park Hotels &
Resorts, Inc. is also a citizen of Virginia, (Doc. 17 ¶ 16), affirmatively demonstrating that no
diversity jurisdiction exists in this case. See Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996)
(explaining that district courts only possess diversity of citizenship jurisdiction pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1332 when “the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each
defendant”).
Moreover, Plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege that the Court possesses federal
question jurisdiction. Plaintiff begins her Amended Complaint by listing various federal statutes
but never connects them to Defendants’ alleged wrongdoing. Plaintiff goes on to claim that
Defendants are “in violation of FICO,” (Doc. 10 at 6), but, again, fails to explain how. Such
conclusory allegations, without more, fail to state a claim arising under federal law and are
therefore insufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction. See Allah El v. Avesta Homes, LLC,
520 F. App’x 806, 809 (11th Cir. 2013) (“Federal question jurisdiction exists only when the
plaintiff[’s] well-pleaded complaint presents issues of federal law.”).
Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and
made a part of this Order.
2. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or
Costs (Doc. 2) is DENIED.
Page 2 of 3
3. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The
Clerk is directed to close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 13, 2017.
Copies furnished to:
Unrepresented Party
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?