Smith v. Ivory et al

Filing 3

ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 7/18/2017. (TKW)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
RICHARD JEROME SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 6:17-cv-1270-Orl-31KRS

WAYNE IVORY, BREVARD COUNTY
JAIL COMPLEX, LAW LIBRARIAN
OF INMATES LIBRARY, OIC’S OF
ALL DEPUTIES E.T.A.L., MENTAL
HEALTH INTAKE STAFF, L.T.’S
REPRISOL E.T.A.L., CAPTAIN’S
REPRISOL E.T.A.L., SGT’S REPRISOL
E.T.A.L., CHAPLIAN’S REPRISOL
E.T.A.L. and ARMOR MEDICAL
STAFF UNIT OSHA ACT REPRISOL,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint (Doc. 1). Plaintiff’s
allegations are largely unintelligible.
Section 1915(g) of Title 28 limits a prisoner’s ability to bring a civil action in forma
pauperis under certain circumstances:
(g)
In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a
judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner
has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any
facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was
dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Thus, if a prisoner has had three or more cases dismissed for one of
the recited reasons, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis and must pay the filing fee in
full at the time the lawsuit is initiated. Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir.
2002). Consequently, courts have a responsibility to dismiss cases, even sua sponte, under
28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). See, e.g., Casey v. Scott, 493 F. App’x 1000, 1001 (11th Cir. 2012).
The Court takes judicial notice of filings previously brought by Plaintiff that were
dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted: (1) 6:16-cv-692-Orl-18TBS; (2) 6:16-cv-772-Orl-37DAB;
and (3) 6:17-cv-804-Orl-18KRS.
Plaintiff has had at least three prior cases dismissed as frivolous or for failure to
state a claim. Moreover, Plaintiff has failed to allege that he is under imminent danger of
serious physical injury. Therefore, Plaintiff was required to pay the full filing fee at the
time he initiated this action. Consequently, this case is dismissed without prejudice.
Plaintiff may initiate a new civil rights action by filing a new civil rights complaint form
and paying the full filing fee.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
1.

This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

2.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on July 18, 2017.

Page 2 of 3

Copies furnished to:
Unrepresented Party
OrlP-1

Page 3 of 3