Hansen et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 87

ORDER adopting 84 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 75 MEMORANDUM in support of Reasonable Attorney's Fees re 74 Order on Motion for Settlement filed by Kristopher Hansen, Gayna Hansen. The Memorandum of Law in Support of Reasonable Attorney's Fees (Doc. 75) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs are awarded attorney's fees against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. in the total amount of $4,560.00. The Memorandum is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 2/13/2019. (MMW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION GAYNA HANSEN and KRISTOPHER HANSEN, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 6:17-cv-1559-Orl-40GJK UBER , INC. and RASIER (FL), LLC, Defendants. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Reasonable Attorney's Fees (Doc. 75) filed on December 21, 2018. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation filed January 29, 2019 (Doc. 84), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. The Memorandum of Law in Support of Reasonable Attorney's Fees (Doc. 75) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: A. Plaintiffs are awarded attorney’s fees against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. in the total amount of $4,560.00; and B. The Memorandum is otherwise DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on February 13, 2019. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?