DLI Assets, LLC v. Universal Processing Network, LLC et al
Filing
45
ORDER denying without prejudice 42 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. See Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 3/24/2023. (TBS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
DLI ASSETS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No: 6:17-cv-1953-ACC-DCI
UNIVERSAL PROCESSING
NETWORK, LLC and MICHAEL
AVERBUKH,
Defendants.
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court for consideration without oral argument on the
following motion:
MOTION:
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Doc. 42)
FILED:
March 2, 2023
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice.
On April 4, 2022, Regions Bank (Garnishee) filed its answer to the writ of garnishment in
this case, stating that it held $2,871.57 in a checking account and a safe deposit box (the contents
of which are unknown). Doc. 38. By Order dated April 13, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s
motion for an order to allow entry in the safe box finding that Plaintiff failed to comply with Local
Rule 3.01(g). Doc. 41. The Court also found that it:
does not yet know what is in the Safe Box, thus it is also premature to make a
determination of ownership of whatever items are included in the Safe Box. The
Court also notes that Plaintiff did not provide a protocol to open the Safe Box and
to inventory its contents, if such contents were to be found.
Id. at 3.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Order Allowing Entry
into Safe Deposit Box. Doc. 42 (the Motion). Plaintiff states that it “does not have the key
for entry to the Safe Deposit Box, and needs an Order directing Garnishee, Regions Bank,
N.A. to have the Safe Deposit Box opened and the proceeds inventoried and reported to
the Court.” Id. at 1. Plaintiff states that if it seeks to take possession of any contents of the
inventory it will file a motion and Garnishee will retain possession pending any further
motion. Id. at 2. Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff’s judgment remains unpaid and it is entitled
to have any valuables owned by Defendant in the Garnishee’s possession with an aggregate
not to exceed that amount. Id.
Upon due consideration, the Motion (Doc. 42) is due to be denied. Again, Plaintiff
has failed to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g). While Plaintiff cites to the rule and states
that counsel has been unable to contact Defendant for conferral, the Local Rule requires
the following:
Unavailability. If the opposing party is unavailable before the motion's
filing, the movant after filing must try diligently for three days to contact
the opposing party. Promptly after either contact or expiration of the three
days, the movant must supplement the motion with a statement certifying
whether the parties have resolved all or part of the motion. Failure to timely
supplement can result in denial of the motion without prejudice. The
purposeful evasion of a communication under this rule can result in a
sanction.
Local Rule 3.01(g)(3) (emphasis in the original). Plaintiff has not filed such a supplement
and, therefore, the Motion is fatally deficient.
Also, the Motion is due to be denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(a).
Namely, Plaintiff does not include a legal memorandum of law in support of the request.
See Local Rule 3.01(a) (“A motion must include — in a single document no longer than
-2-
twenty-five pages inclusive of all parts — a concise statement of the precise relief
requested, a statement of the basis for the request, and a legal memorandum supporting the
request.”). Unlike Plaintiff’s April 11, 2022 request for an order permitting entry into the
safe deposit box, it appears that instant Motion attempts to provide some protocol to open
and inventory the contents. However, with no citation to authority, the Court is unable to
determine if Plaintiff’s proposal is appropriate and Plaintiff is otherwise entitled to relief.
Based on the foregoing, the Motion (Doc. 42) is DENIED without prejudice.
ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on March 24, 2023.
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?