Wiseman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

ORDER adopting 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Linda C. Wiseman. Enter judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner of SocialSecurity and against Plaintiff Linda C. Wiseman; and close the file. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/21/2018. (ctp) (JLC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION LINDA C. WISEMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:17-cv-2209-Orl-37KRS COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _____________________________________ ORDER In this social security appeal, Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her social security disability benefits. (Doc. 1.) In a Report and Recommendation issued November 6, 2018, U.S Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding, upon thorough review of the record and Plaintiff’s three assignments of error, recommends affirming the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 21 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object to the R&R, and the time for doing so has now passed. As such, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no error, the Court concludes that the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. -1- 2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to: a. Enter judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Linda C. Wiseman; and b. Close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on November 21, 2018. Copies to: Counsel of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?