Beaumont v. Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L. et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; granting 24 Motion to Dismiss. The 6 Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. On or before Friday, December 14, 2018, Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint. Failure to timely file may result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Paul G. Byron on 11/26/2018. (SCM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION

MARC BEAUMONT,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No: 6:18-cv-712-Orl-40GJK

ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ &
SCHNEID, P.L., THE BANK OF NEW
YORK MELLON, JONATHON
MEISLES, MELISSA KONICK, KRISTIN
GOTTFRIED, MARK HOLMBERG, IVY
J. TAUB, MONICA DARROW and
JAMIE EPSTEIN,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court on Defendants Robertson, Anschutz &
Schneid, P.L., Jonathon Meisels, Melissa Konick, Kristen Gottfried, Mark Holmberg, Ivy
J. Taub, Monica Darrow, and Jamie Epstein’s Amended Motion to Dismiss (Doc 14 (“First
Motion”)), filed October 4, 2018, and Defendant The Bank of New York Mellon’s Motion
to Dismiss (Doc 24 (“Second Motion”)), filed October 26, 2018. On October 19, 2018,
pro se Plaintiff moved for an extension of time to file a response to the First Motion. (Doc.
22). On October 22, 2018, the Court granted the request and ordered Plaintiff to file a
response by November 23, 2018. (Doc. 23). Plaintiff’s response to the Second Motion
was due on or before November 12, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 6(d) (requiring that a
pro se party opposing a motion file a response within seventeen days after receiving
service of the motion). Under Local Rule 3.01(b), such response must include a

memorandum of legal authority not to exceed twenty pages in length. To date, Plaintiff
has not responded to either motion.
In the absence of a response, the Court finds that the motions are due to be
granted as unopposed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The First Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED.
2. The Second Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) is GRANTED.
3. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
4. On or before Friday, December 14, 2018, Plaintiff may file a second amended
complaint. Failure to timely file will result in dismissal of this action with
prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on November 26, 2018.

Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties

2