Ironworkers Local 808 et al v. Proweld, LLC

Filing 20

ORDER granting 19 Motion for Writ of Garnishment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 12/28/2018. (Smith, Thomas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION IRONWORKERS LOCAL 808, IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION 808 PENSION FUND, IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION 808 ANNUITY FUND, IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION 808 APPRENTICESHIP FUND, RICKY CANTU, WAYNE IVEY, PAUL METTE, WES KENDRICK, GREG HOLMES, MICHAEL HALE, SOUTHEASTERN IRONWORKERS HEALTH CARE PLAN, JODY CREWS, JIMBO BOYKIN, H. PRESTON TAYLOR, ALEXANDER BERGEL, LESTER HENSLEY, JACK JARRELL, WILLIAM MCMILLIAN, ROBERT DUFFIELD, YOSVANY TORRES, WILLIAM BRADLEY, PAUL METTE and WES KENDRICK, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 6:18-cv-810-Orl-40TBS PROWELD, LLC, Defendant. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Writ of Garnishment (Doc. 19). On November 9, 2018, the Clerk of Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant Proweld, LLC “in the amount of $105,398.11, in unpaid contribution, interest, on the unpaid contribution at the 12% rate provided for in the plan, liquidated damages, and attorney fees and costs[.]” (Doc. 18). The judgment has not been satisfied. Now, Plaintiffs seek a writ of garnishment against Austin Commercial, Inc., which they allege may be indebted to Proweld or have property of Proweld in its possession or control (Doc. 19-2). In Florida, judgment creditors are entitled to writs of garnishment. FLA. STAT. § 77.01. All that is necessary to obtain a writ of garnishment is to “file a motion ... stating the amount of the judgment,” FLA. STAT. § 77.03, which Plaintiffs have done here. Plaintiffs’ motion (Doc. 19) is therefore GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ISSUE the writ that appears on the docket as entry 19-2. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 28, 2018. Copies furnished to Counsel of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?