Patterson v. Orlando-Orange County et al

Filing 133

ORDER granting Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.'s 95 motion to dismiss; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 126 Report and Recommendations. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. The Clerk is directed to terminate Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. as a defendant in this matter and amend the case style accordingly. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 5/13/2019. (DJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION DIMITRI PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:18-cv-950-Orl-41GJK ORLANDO-ORANGE COUNTY, HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. and CORNITA RILEY, Defendants. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion,” Doc. 95). United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 126), recommending that the Motion be granted and the case be dismissed with prejudice as to Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Plaintiff filed an Objection, asserting, without explanation, that the Report and Recommendation is contrary to law. (Obj., Doc. 129, at 1). After a de novo review, the Court agrees with the analysis set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 126) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 95) is GRANTED. 3. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 83) is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Page 1 of 2 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. as a defendant in this matter and amend the case style accordingly. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on May 13, 2019. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?