Arafat v. United States Postal Service, USPS
ORDER adopting 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed by Nasra M. Arafat (Ibrahim). Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 2/16/2021. (BIA) (ctp)
Case 6:20-cv-01858-RBD-EJK Document 21 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 425
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
NASRA M. ARAFAT (IBRAHIM),
Case No. 6:20-cv-1858-RBD-EJK
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, moved to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Doc. 19
(“IFP Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd recommends denying
the IFP Motion, finding no legal or factual basis for Plaintiff’s appeal. (Doc. 20 (“R&R”).)
No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has now passed. Absent
objection, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan 28, 2016); see
also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the
Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.
It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
U.S. Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 20) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order.
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees
or Costs (Doc. 19) is DENIED.
Case 6:20-cv-01858-RBD-EJK Document 21 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 426
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on February 16, 2021.
Pro Se Party
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?