Lindberg v. Gabbard et al

Filing 24

ORDER adopting 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/18/2021. (BIA) (ctp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION LENA MARIE LINDBERG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:21-cv-1372-RBD-GJK MONICA GABBARD; CHRISTA CONKLIN; CARMEN REYES; and RAYMOND HORNSTEIN, Defendants. ________________________________________ ORDER Plaintiff filed a pro se Amended Complaint against judicial assistants and one public defender alleging, among other things, illegal arrest, illegal retainment of property, and retaliation. (Doc. 7.) She also moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 8 (“Motion”).) Given Plaintiff’s pattern of filing frivolous documents, the Court previously required all filings by Plaintiff to be reviewed for frivolity. (Doc. 20.) So on referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly entered a Report and Recommendation submitting that the Court deny the Motion and dismiss the Amended Complaint with prejudice as unintelligible, illegible, and noncompliant with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 22, p. 3 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object and the deadline has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 8) is DENIED. 3. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on November 18, 2021. Copies to: Pro se Plaintiff Lena Marie Lindberg 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?