Lindberg v. Gabbard et al

Filing 24

ORDER adopting 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/18/2021. (BIA) (ctp)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 6:21-cv-1372-RBD-GJK

MONICA GABBARD; CHRISTA
CONKLIN; CARMEN REYES; and
RAYMOND HORNSTEIN,
Defendants.
________________________________________
ORDER
Plaintiff filed a pro se Amended Complaint against judicial assistants and
one public defender alleging, among other things, illegal arrest, illegal retainment
of property, and retaliation. (Doc. 7.) She also moved to proceed in forma pauperis.
(Doc. 8 (“Motion”).) Given Plaintiff’s pattern of filing frivolous documents, the
Court previously required all filings by Plaintiff to be reviewed for frivolity. (Doc.
20.) So on referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly entered a Report and
Recommendation submitting that the Court deny the Motion and dismiss the
Amended Complaint with prejudice as unintelligible, illegible, and noncompliant
with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 22, p. 3 (“R&R”).)
The parties did not object and the deadline has passed, so the Court
examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781,

784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

The R&R (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of
this Order in its entirety.

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 8) is DENIED.

3.

The

Amended

Complaint (Doc.

7)

is

DISMISSED

WITH

PREJUDICE.
4.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on November
18, 2021.

Copies to:
Pro se Plaintiff Lena Marie Lindberg

2