Lindberg v. Oaks et al
ORDER adopting 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/18/2021. (BIA) (ctp)
Case 6:21-cv-01417-RBD-GJK Document 20 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 545
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
Case No. 6:21-cv-1417-RBD-GJK
KEVIN OAKS; JOE PINSKER;
JAMES ADAMS; RALPH GARCIA;
SHADRICK CARTER; WILL
NEWMAN; LISA GERMAN;
JERROD GERWIG; JOHN BARBERI;
JOHN DOE; and MATHEW
Plaintiff filed the pro se Amended Complaint against Defendants, alleging
she received death threats and making other assertions unconnected to a cause of
action. (Doc. 7.) She also moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 8 (“Motion”).)
Given Plaintiff’s pattern of filing frivolous documents, the Court previously
required all filings by Plaintiff to be reviewed for frivolity. (Doc. 17.) So on referral,
U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly entered a Report and Recommendation
submitting that the Court should deny the Motion and dismiss the Amended
Complaint with prejudice as unintelligible, frivolous, and noncompliant with the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 18, p. 3 (“R&R”).)
Case 6:21-cv-01417-RBD-GJK Document 20 Filed 11/18/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 546
The parties did not object and the deadline has passed, so the Court
examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781,
784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The R&R (Doc. 18) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of
this Order in its entirety.
Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 8) is DENIED.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on November
Pro se Plaintiff Lena Marie Lindberg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?