Lindberg v. Utsler et al

Filing 33

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the R&R (Doc. 32) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 27) is DENIED. Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Eleventh Circuit of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4). Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 5/22/2023. (ALL)

Download PDF
Case 6:21-cv-01544-RBD-DCI Document 33 Filed 05/22/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 558 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION LENA MARIE LINDBERG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:21-cv-1544-RBD-DCI MICHAEL UTSLER; MICHAEL BERNARD; ROBERT WAYNE IVEY; KEVIN ROBERTS; UNKNOWN #1; and UNKNOWN #2, Defendants. ____________________________________ ORDER Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendants. (Doc. 1.) Over a year after the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint, she moved to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 24; Doc. 27 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends the Court deny the Motion because the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Doc. 32 (“R&R”).) The time has passed and there were no objections, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 32) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of Case 6:21-cv-01544-RBD-DCI Document 33 Filed 05/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 559 this Order in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 27) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s appeal is not taken in good faith. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Eleventh Circuit of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on May 22, 2023. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?