Lindberg v. Citro et al
Filing
13
ORDER adopting #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Lena Marie Lindberg. The Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 11/18/2021. (BIA) (ctp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
Plaintiff,
v.
VINCENT ALBERT CITRO;
UNKNOWN BREVARD COUNTY
ANIMAL SHELTER EMPLOYEE #1;
UNKNOWN BREVARD COUNTY
ANIMAL SHELTER EMPLOYEE #2;
CARLY CHRISTENSEN; RICHARD
APPLEBAUM; KIMBERLY
BARDING; C. THOMPSON; HADI
KHOURI; BRUCE BARNETT; JIM
BLISS; KELLI; LAURIE; LORI
FRANCIS; UNNAMED GUNMAN;
AUBREY BARBER; SAMUAL
EDWARDS; PHILIP GLEN
ARCHER; M. MATHERS; PATRICIA
REGO CHAPMAN; KELLY CHASE;
DAVID SILVERMAN; UNNAMED
“AUCTIONEER”; DAVID WILES;
CRAIG FINKLESTEIN; HAROLD
UHRIG; ROBERT BLAISE TRETTIS;
“GAIL”; JAQUELYN ARES;
ROBERT DAWIDIUK; UNNAMED
BURGLARY ACCOMPLICE #1;
UNNAMED BURGLARY
ACCOMPLICE #2; UNNAMED
BURGLARY ACCOMPLICE #3;
JEANNIE HOFFHINE; DAVID
BUTLER; CHRISTOPHER SHAW;
GEORGE PENLEY; TUCKER
Case No. 6:21-cv-1746-RBD-GJK
MODERSON; EDWARD MELVIN
FITZGERALD; BRUCE LEE ASSAM;
JINELLE GILLETTE; and ERIC
THOMPSON,
Defendants.
____________________________________
ORDER
Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendants, alleging theft, illegal
arrest, sexual assault, grand larceny, and other crimes. (Doc. 1.) Given Plaintiff’s
pattern of filing frivolous documents, the Court previously entered an Order in
seven other cases filed by Plaintiff requiring that all future filings in any case be
reviewed for frivolity. See, e.g., No. 6:21-cv-1372-RBD-GJK, Doc. 20. So on referral,
U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly entered a Report and Recommendation
submitting that the Court should dismiss the Complaint with prejudice as
unintelligible, frivolous, and noncompliant with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. (Doc. 4, p. 4 (“R&R”).)
The parties did not object and the deadline has passed, so the Court
examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781,
784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The R&R (Doc. 4) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of
this Order in its entirety.
2
2.
The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on November
18, 2021.
Copies to:
Pro se Plaintiff Lena Marie Lindberg
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?